Impact and co‑publication indicators are based on Web of Science publications only.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 77.6%.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA and published 2012 to 2018. Only publications which have been affiliated to KTH are included. This means that publications written by a researcher before she/he was employed at KTH, and that are not affiliated to KTH, will not be included in the statistics.
Statistics regarding citations and co‑publishing are based on the subset of publications in DiVA that are registered in Web of Science.
For further questions, contact the KTH Library at biblioteket@kth.se.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Science Citation Index Expended (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI), Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Sciences (CPCI-S) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities (CPCI -SSH) (2020) of Clarivate Analytics (US) LLC. All rights reserved. No part of these materials may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photographic, magnetic or other means without the expressed permission of the KTH Library.
| DiVA publication type | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Publications | WoS coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 1337.6 | 1484.1 | 1544.6 | 1515.6 | 1492.9 | 1494.6 | 1461.2 | 10330.6 | 88.1% |
| Article, other | 122.6 | 82.5 | 116.9 | 99.2 | 119.2 | 94.8 | 108.6 | 743.8 | 81.6% |
| Conference paper, peer review | 921.2 | 925.8 | 882.1 | 820.5 | 695.7 | 704.1 | 682.2 | 5631.7 | 58.3% |
| Conference paper, other | 387.0 | 381.7 | 257.9 | 230.4 | 197.4 | 156.7 | 147.6 | 1758.6 | 2.9% |
| Book | 9.3 | 17.6 | 14.3 | 15.5 | 18.6 | 16.3 | 9.0 | 100.5 | 0.0% |
| Anthology (editor) | 15.8 | 13.2 | 10.1 | 6.7 | 3.8 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 61.8 | 0.0% |
| Chapter in book | 147.2 | 161.2 | 120.2 | 128.4 | 107.6 | 129.1 | 133.7 | 927.5 | 4.6% |
| Article, book review | 19.0 | 16.0 | 11.0 | 15.1 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 11.0 | 97.1 | 58.8% |
| Proceeding (editor) | 4.5 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 9.0 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 37.4 | 2.7% |
| Report | 135.9 | 133.8 | 105.3 | 78.0 | 72.1 | 58.7 | 59.6 | 643.6 | 0.0% |
| Doctorate thesis | 251.0 | 245.0 | 297.0 | 292.0 | 318.0 | 302.0 | 271.0 | 1976.0 | 0.0% |
| Licentiate thesis | 143.0 | 139.0 | 118.0 | 121.0 | 93.0 | 77.0 | 58.0 | 749.0 | 0.0% |
| Patent, approved | 8.7 | 8.4 | 6.4 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 36.1 | 0.0% |
| Publication Year | Publications | Average Citations | Total Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 1653.5 | 5552.5 | 3.4 | 616.0 | 37.3% |
| 2013 | 1796.2 | 6805.3 | 3.8 | 619.3 | 34.5% |
| 2014 | 1966.9 | 7696.2 | 3.9 | 667.9 | 34.0% |
| 2015 | 1886.1 | 8746.9 | 4.6 | 594.4 | 31.5% |
| 2016 | 1833.4 | 7509.3 | 4.1 | 606.5 | 33.1% |
| Total | 9136.1 | 36310.2 | 4.0 | 3104.3 | 34.0% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-2014 | 3761.2 | 1.15 | 437.3 | 11.6% |
| 2013-2015 | 3961.3 | 1.19 | 466.1 | 11.8% |
| 2014-2016 | 3998.0 | 1.13 | 434.8 | 10.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 3935.2 | 1.13 | 423.3 | 10.8% |
| Total | 7696.4 | 1.14 | 860.6 | 11.2% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 2759 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 71.2%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6974 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 87.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-2014 | 3761.2 | 1.27 | 1156.4 | 30.7% |
| 2013-2015 | 3961.5 | 1.27 | 1222.8 | 30.9% |
| 2014-2016 | 4001.8 | 1.26 | 1227.0 | 30.7% |
| 2015-2017 | 3943.8 | 1.25 | 1196.0 | 30.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 3860.3 | 1.26 | 1191.9 | 30.9% |
| Total | 8968.0 | 1.26 | 2761.6 | 30.8% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6974 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 87.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-2014 | 6869 | 1124 | 16.4% | 4200 | 61.1% |
| 2013-2015 | 7397 | 1312 | 17.7% | 4717 | 63.8% |
| 2014-2016 | 7860 | 1433 | 18.2% | 5253 | 66.8% |
| 2015-2017 | 8223 | 1573 | 19.1% | 5738 | 69.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 8443 | 1693 | 20.1% | 6026 | 71.4% |
| Total | 17945 | 3294 | 18.4% | 11994 | 66.8% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6869 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 3140 | 1190 | 139 | 189 | 705 | 157 | 1950 | 37.9% |
| 2013 | 3358 | 1330 | 209 | 191 | 771 | 159 | 2028 | 39.6% |
| 2014 | 3560 | 1451 | 351 | 161 | 794 | 145 | 2109 | 40.8% |
| 2015 | 3709 | 1736 | 482 | 254 | 892 | 108 | 1973 | 46.8% |
| 2016 | 3878 | 1896 | 524 | 322 | 888 | 162 | 1982 | 48.9% |
| 2017 | 4019 | 2100 | 640 | 391 | 926 | 143 | 1919 | 52.3% |
| 2018 | 4052 | 2203 | 678 | 482 | 860 | 183 | 1849 | 54.4% |
| Total | 25716 | 11906 | 3023 | 1990 | 5836 | 1057 | 13810 | 46.3% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.