The 1.0 release is done, three releases have been published so far

• Progress - What is new since last meeting?

• A short demo of the ABM app

• Future directions after 1.0 release

• Our questions to you

• Your feedback and your suggestions and comments to us

The first step of the project plan was a re-implementation of the old ABM.

• More attractive and dynamic presentation
• Same results, based on DiVA and Bibmet
• New : Share of uncited publications
• New : Overview for Open Access publications
• New : Notes to help with interpretation of indicators/results

There is now a public version of the app showing breakdowns for KTH units. It allows researchers to login using their KTH account to view their own data.

• In addition to the total and average number of citations, the number and share of uncited publications are included
• Uncited here means not cited after 3 years (the publication year and the two following years)
• The other end of “Top 10% cited”

• The number of publications for the row with least number of publication in each table.

• A warning text if any row is based on less than 50 publications.

• Shows the Web of Science coverage for the row with least coverage in each table.

• Displays poor, moderate or good WoS coverage.

• For individuals, there is a general word of caution for everybody regardless of size or coverage.

Going forward, we have planned to work on these areas:

• About tab
• More comprehensive co-publication information
• Collaboration networks
• Additional data sources
• Other apps to complement the ABM

Please think about what would be most interesting to you in the short run?

Currently:

• brief information in the Overview tab
• longer texts in Guide to ABM and other documents linked from Overview
• technical documentation at https://KTH-Library.github.io

More information needed, such as:

• Where do these data come from and when was it retrieved?
• What criteria were used to select which publications to include?
• More comprehensive description of indicators
• Outside of the ABM, how is bibliometrics used at KTH?

• Access through API wrappers to new data sources
  • Use case described by Chip related to DiVA data quality improvements -> new R packages with API Wrapper clients
    • kthapi for accessing data from KTH APIs
    • dblp for accessing data from API at https://dblp.org (CS biliographics)
    • XsearchLIBRIS for searches against LIBRIS and SwePub
  • Co-publication
• KTH Styling for R users: ktheme … used for example to make these slides

• Does the in-dashboard notes to assist in interpreting indicators in the case of low n help?
• Do you think the PDF Guide works? Is it useful?
• What information would you like to see in an About tab?
• What do you think is missing in the ABM dashboard?
• Should the personal pages also include non-KTH publications?
• Should app data be static (yearly) or continuously updated?